These results included lack of employment

The majority of respondents found current cannabis policy largely ineffective as a deterrent to cannabis use. It was considered that, while it discouraged use among some sectors of society, cannabis was indeed accepted among other groups and, among those who chose not to use it, the different causes had in all probability been more important in their selection. Maori respondents felt that cannabis use was very fashionable among younger Maori and that legislation did not deter their use. Many respondents perceived that the cannabis economy was thriving. Concern was expressed that the cultivation and distribution of cannabis is increasingly being managed by people with criminal backgrounds and the high levels of violence associated with this black market financial system. Some felt the publicity about the crop recovery only raised the value. Profits for many large-scale cannabis suppliers. However, data from the 1990 survey further revealed that many customers purchase their marijuana products at no cost. Among current users (12% of the employer), 43% received all of their marijuana for nothing and another 21% purchased most of their supply for free. About 9% had been growing at least some marijuana for private use. Only 11% reported having purchased all of their supplies.

Uso recreativo de cannabis: solo para mayores de 25 años, advierten - Tecnológico de Monterrey However, some were concerned about the discretionary powers of the police under the scheme, the potential for discriminatory software, and the truth that an acknowledgment of guilt was a precondition for diversion. Many respondents felt that current cannabis coverage did not place enough emphasis on education about the health outcomes of cannabis use. Because of this, and in the absence of a clear and authoritative wellness perspective, many myths were seen to circulate regarding the health effects of cannabis use. Respondents concerned about these offenses detected or prosecuted for cannabis-associated offenses felt that the impression on the offender was different in response to their sanction. Those who had been diverted tended to be scared, yet relieved and grateful. The impression of the defendants was much more negative. These effects included loss of employment, accommodation, or club membership, decreased travel alternatives, and feelings of depression, mistrust, defiance, or resentment in the direction of the law.

Many government departments. Organizations have contributed to the cannabis policy event. These include the New Zealand Police, the Ministry of Welfare, the Justice Division, the Ministry of Education, the Medicine Advisory Committee and the New Zealand Drug Base. In 1984, a Heylen survey of 1,000 New Zealanders found that 59% believed the laws and penalties against marijuana had been passable. The 1990 drug survey conducted by the Alcohol and Public Health Analysis Unit found that, when asked about the appropriateness of the scope of law enforcement for marijuana users, 32% of respondents felt they had been satisfactory, a quarter felt they were too heavy and a quarter felt they were too soft. Most felt that the application ranges for marijuana suppliers have been too light. In 1991, more than 19 were reported. 000 cannabis-related crimes in New Zealand. Social concern has been expressed. Economic prices of the application of the legislation on cannabis. In recent years, resources have been directed more to the supply of cannabis than to its use, with lighter penalties for minor cannabis-related offenses.

A coverage assessment of cannabis use, possession and supply was carried out in New Zealand in 1992, three times with funding from the New Zealand Police and Health Division. Collectively bring written information. Verbal Sources as Contribution in Directing Future Dialogue on Cannabis Coverage. The policy options achievable for New Zealand have been contextualized through an assessment of the illicit drug policies of other Western nations. The status and context of cannabis coverage in New Zealand has been investigated, along with the position of stakeholders and interest groups in the sector. Accessible statistics on cannabis use. In addition, the effect of the legislative enforcement measures was reviewed. 28 key informants have been interviewed for their views on cannabis prohibition, cannabis prohibition, implementation of the current policy and its implications, and your suggestions for policy change. Several points emerging from current cannabis policy have been identified and examined. Policy options for the administration of cannabis range from total prohibition coverage, as in New Zealand and many other Western nations, to free availability (with restrictions, equivalent to sale to minors), very similar to the case of alcohol in this country.

You Might Also Like